For those afraid of the children being exploited. If the PM's dogs were unable to get any evidence of any misdeed, then there were none.
Henson never approaches a child. He gives his card to the child's parent/s and waits for them to get in touch with him - if they want to. The parents meet with Henson and he shows them his work and talks to them about the possibility of the child becoming a model for him.
Then the parents and the child talk. Henson may hear no more about it. He simply gives his card initially. All other meetings are decided upon by the parents.
If the parents should want their child to do it and the child doesn't want to - it's a no show. Response from child models who are now in their 20s and 30s is that it's something they are extremely proud of. One out of lots has said that she wouldn't do it again, but not because she thought it was bad, pornographic or ugly - just simply because she's a different person now and that's such a terribly small representation of who she is.
I am uncomfortable with any adult who photographs kids in this way.
But to censor an entire countries internet over it is stupid.
The image itself to me is twisted. I don't care if the kids and the parents were ok with it. This is close enough to child porn I can not help but believe that is what in this mans mind when he asks them to take off their clothes.
5 comments:
For those afraid of the children being exploited. If the PM's dogs were unable to get any evidence of any misdeed, then there were none.
Henson never approaches a child. He gives his card to the child's parent/s and waits for them to get in touch with him - if they want to. The parents meet with Henson and he shows them his work and talks to them about the possibility of the child becoming a model for him.
Then the parents and the child talk. Henson may hear no more about it. He simply gives his card initially. All other meetings are decided upon by the parents.
If the parents should want their child to do it and the child doesn't want to - it's a no show. Response from child models who are now in their 20s and 30s is that it's something they are extremely proud of. One out of lots has said that she wouldn't do it again, but not because she thought it was bad, pornographic or ugly - just simply because she's a different person now and that's such a terribly small representation of who she is.
Actually i am uncomfortable with this image.
I am uncomfortable with any adult who photographs kids in this way.
But to censor an entire countries internet over it is stupid.
The image itself to me is twisted. I don't care if the kids and the parents were ok with it. This is close enough to child porn I can not help but believe that is what in this mans mind when he asks them to take off their clothes.
This image bothers me real bad.
I feel sorry for this girl.
There is no purpose to photographing kids like this except to get off on.
There is no way in hell I would let this man anywhere near my kids.
Yes, Christy - that's how it is here too. A raging controversy over his work.
This pic proves he was not doing it to 'show beauty'.
If that had been his goal, every hair would have been in place instead of just looking limp and unstyled.
Her actual beauty can not even be defined because the shadows are sloppy.
He made no actual attempt at beauty, or even pride... and went straight for nipples.
This picture had one purpose, to show a little girls breasts. That is it.
Post a Comment